Genome-wide loss of heterozygosity predicts aggressive, treatment-refractory behavior in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

Authors

Lin AL

Rudneva VA

Richards AL

Zhang Y

Woo HJ

Cohen M

Tisnado J

Majd N

Wardlaw SL

Page-Wilson G

Sengupta S

Chow F

Goichot B

Ozer BH

Dietrich J

Nachtigall L

Desai A

Alano T

Ogilive S

Solit DB

Bale TA

Rosenblum M

Donoghue MTA

Geer EB

Tabar V

Doi

PMID: 38758238 · DOI: 10.1007/s00401-024-02736-8 · Journal: Acta Neuropathologica (2024)

TL;DR

This study sequenced 92 pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) using MSK-IMPACT and whole-exome sequencing, comparing 23 aggressive, treatment-refractory tumors to 69 benign tumors. The authors found that genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is significantly elevated in treatment-refractory PitNETs, with a recurrent chromosomal LOH pattern in corticotroph tumors involving 12 specific chromosomes. A random forest machine learning classifier using fraction of LOH achieved an accuracy of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.70–0.96) for predicting treatment-refractory behavior, outperforming TP53 mutational status alone.

Cohort & data

  • Retrospective cohort (n = 26): Patients with aggressive/treatment-refractory or higher-risk pituitary adenomas (PTAD); 22 of 26 (85%) were treatment-refractory (progression after surgery, medical therapy, and radiation); 10 (38%) were metastatic.
  • Prospective cohort (n = 66): Unselected patients presenting to MSKCC for pituitary surgery; only 1 patient met treatment-refractory criteria.
  • Analytic groups: 23 treatment-refractory and 69 benign PitNETs after stratification by response to radiotherapy.
  • Sequencing: All tumors sequenced via MSK-IMPACT; retrospective cohort also underwent whole-exome sequencing for USP8 mutation detection.
  • Copy-number analysis: FACETS v0.5.6 for allele-specific copy-number and LOH inference.
  • Validation: FISH on five patients to confirm chromosomal losses.
  • Dataset: ptad_msk_2024; data deposited in cBioPortal and dbGaP (phs001783).

Key findings

  • Treatment-refractory PitNETs had significantly higher tumor mutational burden (p = 1.3 x 10^-10) and fraction of LOH (p = 8.5 x 10^-9) compared to benign tumors (PMID:38758238).
  • TP53 mutations were the most common gene-level alteration in treatment-refractory tumors (12/23 treatment-refractory vs. 1/69 benign; Fisher’s exact test p = 4.2 x 10^-8); 11 of 12 were clonal.
  • A recurrent chromosomal LOH (rcLOH) pattern involving chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 11, 15, 17, 18, 21, and 22 was found in 11/14 treatment-refractory corticotroph PitNETs vs. 1/14 benign corticotroph tumors (Fisher’s exact test p = 1.7 x 10^-4).
  • FISH confirmed that LOH events represent true chromosomal losses (monosomies/hypodiploidy) rather than copy-neutral LOH.
  • Tumors with TP53 mutations had higher fraction of LOH (p = 3.3 x 10^-8).
  • Random forest classifier identified fraction of LOH as the most important predictive feature for treatment-refractory behavior, outperforming TP53 status. A binary LOH threshold of 0.11 achieved AUC = 0.87, accuracy = 0.88 (95% CI: 0.70–0.96), sensitivity = 0.83, specificity = 0.90 on the test set.
  • Five treatment-refractory corticotroph tumors harbored mismatch repair gene mutations (MSH2, MSH6, MLH1), confirmed by loss of protein expression on IHC; 3 of 4 pre-treatment tumors were MSI-high.
  • Treatment-refractory corticotroph tumors uniquely harbored mutations in ATRX, DAXX, TERT, and TSC2, none of which were found in benign tumors.
  • USP8 gain-of-function mutations were rare in aggressive PitNETs (n = 3 of 22 retrospective patients); the one patient with a canonical USP8 hotspot mutation had a complete and durable response to radiation.
  • LOH was stable across sequential resections and was present in pre-radiation specimens, establishing it as an early genomic event rather than a treatment-induced artifact.

Genes & alterations

  • TP53: Somatic mutations enriched in treatment-refractory PitNETs (52% vs. 1.4%); clonal in 11/12 cases; associated with higher fraction of LOH.
  • ATRX / DAXX: Mutations unique to treatment-refractory corticotroph tumors; implicated in alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT).
  • TERT: Mutations found exclusively in treatment-refractory corticotroph PitNETs.
  • TSC2: Mutations found exclusively in treatment-refractory PitNETs.
  • MSH2 / MSH6 / MLH1: Mismatch repair gene mutations in 5 treatment-refractory corticotroph tumors, with loss of protein expression confirmed by IHC.
  • SF3B1: R625C hotspot mutation in 1 of 7 treatment-refractory lactotroph PitNETs; previously reported in aggressive prolactinomas.
  • GNAS: R201 hotspot in 1 treatment-refractory somatotroph PitNET; none in benign somatotrophs in this cohort.
  • USP8: Canonical gain-of-function mutations rare (1/22); not associated with treatment-refractory behavior.
  • CCND3: Amplification acquired in a recurrent tumor (patient TR-9).
  • CDKN2A / CDKN2B: Loss acquired in a recurrent, metastatic tumor (patient TR-9).

Clinical implications

  • Fraction of LOH greater than 0.11 is a candidate biomarker for predicting future aggressive, treatment-refractory behavior in PitNETs at the time of initial resection, with accuracy of 0.88 and negative predictive value of 0.95.
  • Mismatch repair deficiency, present in a subset of treatment-refractory corticotroph PitNETs, may render these tumors responsive to pembrolizumab and other checkpoint inhibitors; dramatic responses have been reported in this context.
  • Temozolomide was used in 77% of retrospective patients; one tumor developed acquired mismatch repair deficiency and hypermutation (93 mut/Mb) under temozolomide pressure with 76% of mutations attributable to the alkylator signature.
  • The rcLOH phenotype in corticotroph tumors resembles patterns seen in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and adrenocortical carcinoma, suggesting shared endocrine tumor biology that may inform cross-tumor therapeutic strategies.

Limitations & open questions

  • The cohort is limited in size (23 treatment-refractory, 69 benign), reflecting the rarity of treatment-refractory PitNETs. Larger prospective cohorts with longer follow-up are needed for validation.
  • The retrospective cohort is enriched for aggressive tumors (referral bias to MSKCC), so prevalence estimates of specific alterations may not generalize.
  • The prospective cohort may not capture the full spectrum of PitNET behavior given the relatively short follow-up period.
  • USP8 is not on MSK-IMPACT panels; whole-exome recapture was only performed for the retrospective cohort, so USP8 status is incomplete for the prospective group.
  • The functional mechanism by which rcLOH drives aggressive behavior (e.g., haploinsufficiency of specific tumor suppressors) remains undefined.
  • Two benign tumors were misclassified as treatment-refractory by the LOH classifier; whether these represent false positives or tumors that will eventually progress is unknown.

Citations from this paper used in the wiki

  • “A higher mutational burden and fraction of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was found in the aggressive, treatment-refractory PitNETs compared to the benign tumors (p = 1.3 x 10^-10 and p = 8.5 x 10^-9, respectively).” (Abstract)
  • TP53 [mutations] were overwhelmingly found in the treatment-refractory tumors (12 of 23 treatment-refractory tumors vs 1 of 69 benign tumors, two-sided Fisher’s exact test: p value = 4.2 x 10^-8).” (Results, p. 6)
  • “This specific pattern of recurrent chromosomal LOH (rcLOH), was observed in 78% (11/14) of the aggressive, treatment-refractory corticotroph PitNETs compared to only a single (1/14) benign corticotroph tumor (one-sided Fisher’s exact test, p = 1.7 x 10^-4).” (Results, p. 7)
  • “A machine learning approach identified loss of heterozygosity as the most predictive variable for aggressive, treatment-refractory behavior, outperforming the most common gene-level alteration, TP53, with an accuracy of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.70-0.96).” (Abstract)
  • “Five aggressive, treatment-refractory corticotroph tumors contained an oncogenic or likely oncogenic alteration in mismatch repair genes (MSH2, MSH6, and MLH1).” (Results, p. 7)

This page was processed by crosslinker on 2026-05-04.