Genomic analysis and clinical correlations of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastasis
PMID: 37591896 · DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40793-x · Journal: Nature Communications (2023)
TL;DR
Skakodub et al. profiled 233 resected NSCLC brain metastases (BM) with MSK-IMPACT plus matched primary tumors (n=47) and extracranial metastases (n=42), with detailed clinical annotation. BM specimens showed higher TMB, FGA, and chromosomal instability than non-BM sites, with CDKN2A/B deletions and cell-cycle pathway alterations enriched in BM. EGFR alterations — often uncommon/non-canonical drivers — were enriched in patients who developed leptomeningeal disease (LMD), and MYC amplifications were associated with multifocal regional intracranial progression PMID:37591896.
Cohort & data
- 233 patients with resected NSCLC BM sequenced by MSK-IMPACT; 180 (77%) LUAD, 23 (10%) LUSC, 30 (13%) other NSCLC. Median age 67; 57% female; 80% current/former smokers.
- Matched samples: 47 primary tumors (PT) and 42 extracranial metastases (EM); downstream LUAD-restricted analysis used 179 BM, 37 PT, 34 EM.
- External comparator LUAD PT cohorts: BM+ (N=32), BM−/EM+ (N=1549), BM−/EM− (N=582).
- Dataset: bm_nsclc_mskcc_2023.
- Assay: MSK-IMPACT targeted panel (IMPACT341 / IMPACT410 / IMPACT468 / IMPACT505) PMID:37591896.
Key findings
- TMB was higher in BM vs extracranial metastases (median 8.8 vs 5.8; p=0.00766) and FGA was higher in BM vs EM (p=2.77e-06) and vs PT (p=2.27e-07) PMID:37591896.
- CDKN2A/CDKN2B alterations were more frequent in BM (34%) than PT (13%) (p=0.003, q=0.04); cell-cycle pathway alterations 56% BM vs 32% PT (p=0.004, q=0.041), driven by CDKN2A/B.
- In the LUAD sub-cohort, CDKN2A/B enrichment persisted (31% BM vs 18% PT; p=0.004) as did cell-cycle pathway enrichment (52% vs 27%; p=0.007).
- Comparing LUAD PT BM+ vs BM−/EM−, TP53, MYC, SMARCA4, RB1, ARID1A, and FOXA1 alterations were enriched in PTs from patients who later developed BM; NKX2-1 alterations were enriched in both BM and EM cohorts.
- Among 179 LUAD BM patients, 101 (56%) had intracranial progression after craniotomy + RT: regional (30%), local (14%), LMD (11%). Median OS 2.7 years (95% CI 2.3–4.0); median iPFS 1.2 years (95% CI 1.0–1.5).
- LMD patients had more EGFR alterations than non-progressors (45% vs 21%; p=0.044). Local progressors had more RB1 loss (24% vs 6%; p=0.022) and NKX3-1 alterations (16% vs 3%; p=0.044). Multifocal regional progressors had MYC amplifications in 22% vs 0% in local progressors (p=0.023). MYC pathway alterations were enriched in LMD (p=0.013, q=0.14) and regional progression groups.
- NF1 alterations were more frequent in LMD patients (15%) than other groups.
- Paired BM–BM samples from multi-lesion patients showed high genomic concordance, contrasting with lower concordance seen in synchronous BM/PT pairs.
Genes & alterations
- CDKN2A / CDKN2B: deep deletions enriched in BM; cell-cycle pathway driver in BM development.
- EGFR: enriched in LMD; uncommon drivers (L861Q, G719A/S, A755G, N771_H773dup) in 45% of LMD patients; persistence of these drivers despite TKI therapy; one vignette showed emergence then clearance of T790M under osimertinib with ongoing L861Q/G719S.
- MYC: amplifications associated with multifocal regional intracranial progression; MYC pathway alterations enriched in LMD and regional progression.
- TP53, KRAS: commonly shared between BM and PT/EM; often truncal.
- RB1: loss associated with local intracranial progression.
- SMARCA4, ARID1A, FOXA1, NKX2-1: enriched in PTs of BM+ patients vs non-metastatic.
- STK11: 22% vs 0% in LUAD BM vs SCC BM (p=0.01).
- NF1: enriched in LMD patients.
- HLA-B: subset of private BM mutations PMID:37591896.
Clinical implications
- Non-canonical EGFR mutations in BM may identify NSCLC patients at elevated risk for LMD and partial resistance to osimertinib, with persistence across serial tissue/CSF samples despite maximal EGFR-directed and local therapy PMID:37591896.
- Cell-cycle / CDKN2A-B loss appears to be a near-obligate event for BM development, suggesting a rationale for CDK4/6-directed strategies in CNS-tropic NSCLC (not tested here).
- MYC amplification may flag patients at risk for multifocal regional intracranial progression.
- Prior erlotinib exposure features in the EGFR-mutant LMD trajectories described.
Limitations & open questions
- Retrospective single-institution cohort, reliant on MSK-IMPACT targeted panel (not WES/WGS).
- Matched PT and EM sample counts are modest (47 and 42 respectively); synchronous BM/PT analysis N=2.
- Some q-values were non-significant after multiple-testing correction (e.g., RB1 local-progression association q=0.573), warranting validation.
- Causal mechanism linking non-canonical EGFR drivers to leptomeningeal tropism vs osimertinib partial resistance remains unresolved.
Citations from this paper used in the wiki
- “CDKN2A/B alterations were more common in the BM samples (34%) compared to PT (13% p=0.003, q=0.04).”
- “MYC amplifications were more common in patients who later suffered multifocal regional progression, compared to those with local progression, where no MYC amplifications were detected (22% vs 0%, p=0.023).”
- “Patients who suffered from LMD frequently exhibited less common EGFR mutations (45%), such as L861Q, G719A/S, A755G, or N771_H773dup.”
- “The median OS and iPFS from BM diagnosis was 2.7 years (95% CI 2.3–4.0) and 1.2 years (95% CI 1.0–1.5).”
This page was processed by crosslinker on 2026-04-11.